CURRENT CODED VERSION ²³²

READ WITH ENCODING NOTES ²³²

[About this free website]²³²

[***][Descriptive version ²³² and click to erase numbers]²³²

ANOTHER LEVEL OF GEMATRIA ²³² set far above the others. ²³² Beyond the confidence level ²³² shown by many common ²³² public gematria examples. ²³² This level is where the ²³² cheap rubber meets the road ²³² because gematria is likely ²³² to be inflated by training ²³² you to accept complex ²³² rules with theatrical ²³² results instead of far ²³² more difficult content. ²³²

Take a look at this test: ²³²

• Do others offer confidence ²³² you can easily measure? ²³²

• Do they use the excuse ²³² that their proficiency ²³² entitles them to force²³² you into following ²³² as they wander additional ²³² roads to questionable ²³² creative destinations? ²³²

• Do they show emphasis ²³² on significant numbers? ²³²

Some emphasize little. ²³² Many are only a few matched, ²³² maybe here or there, by chance. ²³² Real gematria identifying ²³² incredibly interrelated ²³² phrases are captivating.²³²

Anyone can shift differing ²³² match styles that change ²³² questionable numbers ²³² around in a shocking way. ²³² When there are no number ²³² limits, then it’s mixed ²³² results, programing ²³² you to accept any wild ²³² coincidences that may help ²³² make an outrageous match. ²³² Confusion is not art. ²³² Puffery is not science. ²³²

In fact, some who maintain ²³² that they have complete ²³² knowledge of gematria demand ²³² to be believed and trusted, ²³² despite countable flaws. ²³² Did you know frauds lead ²³² some people to pay so ²³² they can glimpse the gift ²³² of divine knowledge from ²³² some who can’t match more ²³² than a few words across ²³² numbers changed quickly ²³² from one day to another? ²³² So how can I call them a fraud? ²³² Because I am also a wicked fraud, ²³² but I’m not hiding evidence. ²³²

Have you seen any create ²³² anything cited like this? ²³²

>>> [Read with encoding notes] ²³²

Could other codes show ²³² as much real repetition? ²³²

Have any been as articulate? ²³² Can any really match this? ²³²

I absolutely doubt it. ²³²

Now imagine an unlimited ²³² drawer of letter blocks for the hypnotic fraud. ²³² Reach to spell anything²³² because the first target ²³² number phases into the ²³² second, then another pair.²³² The magician with arrogance ²³² to answer all numbers ²³² with random accounting, ²³² off to another option. ²³² More options solve ²³² perfectly more easily. ²³²

Frauds also have tricks. ²³² What will they do then, ²³² when you have read these? ²³²

They might try harder, ²³² but they aren’t as exact ²³² in what they accomplish.²³² Matching two words as ²³² if that’s revelation is ²³² at a specifically basic level. ²³² How many even match five? ²³² You realize that even ²³² ten matches is considered ²³² an impossible mission ²³² for many who simply ²³² present a couple of fun ²³² coincidences then switch ²³² their focus entirely. ²³² Yes, impossible for all ²³² who boast about proof ²³² and never supply any. ²³²

The result tricks are ²³² using weird counting, ²³² reversing a number cited, ²³² using initials, filling ²³² in simple words because ²³² they needed “the”, “and”, “at”, “am” or “did” ²³² to make the result hold, ²³² adding resulting digits ²³² from gematria totals and ²³² getting a single digit so ²³² that every word is able ²³² to continue to be matched. ²³²

If all words can result ²³² in a single digit total, all ²³² words automatically ²³² equal to ten percent of ²³² all words which exist. ²³² Ten percent of all other ²³² numbers, of phrases, or ²³² any partial combination ²³² must also match a single ²³² digit artificial result. ²³²

It’s possible to create ²³² a list of phrases believed ²³² to have significance under ²³² one full gematria number, ²³² not a cheating single digit, ²³² but the phrases are chaos. ²³² Unskilled gematria is odd, ²³² random, and always skewed. ²³²

Another trick is citing ²³² important dates while ²³² adjusting considerably ²³² between when the date match ²³² is crucial and when it may ²³² be ignored because working ²³² with the date is too hard. ²³²

Claiming that some public ²³² figure is good or bad while ²³² skipping over the same ²³² process to check instead ²³² for the opposite match. ²³² Creating headline quotes: ²³²
John Q. Public Achievement! ²³²
John Q. Public Greediness! ²³²
John Q. Public Delivering! ²³²
John Q. Public Embarrassed! ²³²
John Q. Public Unifying! ²³²
John Q. Public Suffering! ²³²
The personal bias concedes ²³² John Q. Public Nonsense! ²³²

A goal for this website can ²³² be to answer gematria heard ²³² or seen which is theater ²³² masquerading as wisdom. ²³² When you do recognize ²³² the long continuous ²³² chain of authentic matching²³² you are now skimming, ²³² the alternatives look ²³² somewhat infuriating. ²³²

No one should insist ²³² that they receive actual ²³² compensation for doing ²³² gematria mathematics at all. ²³² Those who do are clearly ²³² taking advantage of anyone ²³² who doesn’t realize the ²³² simplicity of mixing ²³² and matching when they decide ²³² what to assert next. ²³² That’s low, in both who ²³² and what gematria can reflect. ²³²

On the other hand, in advanced ²³² gematria we could see even ²³² higher levels improved. ²³² Speaking in gematria aloud ²³² would sound strange ²³² if it must be narrative ²³² while forcing each phrase and ²³² sentence to match a single ²³² gematria total exactly. ²³² Is that notion achievable? ²³² It is certainly achievable. ²³² It’s here in your hands. ²³² Not one deviation when ²³² you double-check any math. ²³² Not a single word is read ²³² while the gematria total ²³² breaks apart the base word. ²³² Not one sentence passed ²³² without a number behind ²³² all ending punctuation. ²³²

So what is the bottom ²³² line for this story? ²³²

This is likely the dream ²³² level of incredible gematria ²³² at no cost for anybody.²³² This single sequence of ²³² repeating numbers say ²³² more in one page than some ²³² “experts” have convinced ²³² others to pay cash for ²³² and leave their fine families. ²³²

If you have never argued ²³² that your salary is ²³² well spent on wrong ²³² predictions or phrase ²³² manipulators common ²³² in the gematria categories,²³² be absolutely thankful. ²³² A few are caught up, fooled, and ²³² paying for revelation. ²³² Some have been caught into ²³² webs of prediction not ²³² worthy of the wealth ²³² the spider spun into ²³² their own open pocket. ²³²

Anyone can maximize any ²³² gematria result meaning ²³² if they have verbal skill. ²³² The tricks are harmless ²³² unless the answer is a ²³² “divine” gematria result. ²³² I can assure you, I am done ²³² being impressed by word ²³² combinations somebody ²³² said “proves” any test. ²³² Give me a few minutes to ²³² think, and I’ll effectively ²³² destroy the improbable ²³² with human intelligence, ²³² caffeine, chocolate, and a keyboard. ²³²

That’s not a cheeky boast. ²³² It’s a plea for anyone eager ²³² to put faith or meaning ²³² into gematria analysis. ²³² Please identify the danger ²³² that trusting biases ²³² proclaimed to be math from ²³² secret sources is dated. ²³²
Historical claims of any ²³² gematria power are labored. ²³² Computers make data even ²³² more powerful today. ²³² You are reading complete ²³² sentences in old gematria. ²³² Why is there no limit? ²³² I’ll certainly ask it again, ²³² is that not a wake up call? ²³²

Since you have identified ²³² the problem with feeling ²³² impressed by theatrical²³² misdirection instead of a ²³² skilled gematria display, ²³² it’s forgivable whether ²³² you lost money or ²³² just time on fantasy ²³² salesmen and mystery. ²³² But once you’ve built ²³² up your confidence, change ²³² your expectation of ²³² what it takes to believe ²³² you are seeing expert ²³² gematria, instead of broken ²³² methods and maneuvering. ²³²

But most of all realize ²³² that yesterday you ²³² thought the analysis ²³² you had seen was accurate. ²³² Today you can exercise ²³² your option to see ²³² a type of gematria proof ²³² best described as purely ²³² another level of gematria. ²³²

[***][Descriptive version²³² for natural readability²³²]