= Descriptive version without the numeric for natural readability =

>>> [Read with encoding notes]

ANOTHER LEVEL OF GEMATRIA set far above the others. Beyond the confidence level shown by many common public gematria examples. This level is where the cheap rubber meets the road because gematria is likely to be inflated by training you to accept complex rules with theatrical results instead of far more difficult content.

Take a look at this test:

• Do others offer confidence you can easily measure?
• Do they use the excuse that their proficiency entitles them to force you into following as they wander additional roads to questionable creative destinations?
• Do they show emphasis on significant numbers?

Some emphasize little. Many are only a few matched, maybe here or there, by chance. Real gematria identifying incredibly interrelated phrases are captivating.

Anyone can shift differing match styles that change questionable numbers around in a shocking way. When there are no number limits, then it’s mixed results, programing you to accept any wild coincidences that may help make an outrageous match. Confusion is not art. Puffery is not science.

In fact, some who maintain that they have complete knowledge of gematria demand to be believed and trusted, despite countable flaws. Did you know frauds lead some people to pay so they can glimpse the gift of divine knowledge from some who can’t match more than a few words across numbers changed quickly from one day to another? So how can I call them a fraud? Because I am also a wicked fraud, but I’m not hiding evidence.

Have you seen any create anything cited like this?

>>> [Read with encoding notes]

Could other codes show as much real repetition?

Have any been as articulate? Can any really match this?

I absolutely doubt it.

Now imagine an unlimited drawer of letter blocks for the hypnotic fraud. Reach to spell anything because the first target number phases into the second, then another pair. The magician with arrogance to answer all numbers with random accounting, off to another option. More options solve perfectly more easily.

Frauds also have tricks. What will they do then, when you have read these?

They might try harder, but they aren’t as exact in what they accomplish. Matching two words as if that’s revelation is at a specifically basic level. How many even match five? You realize that even ten matches is considered an impossible mission for many who simply present a couple of fun coincidences then switch their focus entirely. Yes, impossible for all who boast about proof and never supply any.

The result tricks are using weird counting, reversing a number cited, using initials, filling in simple words because they needed “the”, “and”, “at”, “am” or “did” to make the result hold, adding resulting digits from gematria totals and getting a single digit so that every word is able to continue to be matched.

If all words can result in a single digit total, all words automatically equal to ten percent of all words which exist. Ten percent of all other numbers, of phrases, or any partial combination must also match a single digit artificial result.

It’s possible to create a list of phrases believed to have significance under
one full gematria number, not a cheating single digit, but the phrases are chaos. Unskilled gematria is odd, random, and always skewed.

Another trick is citing important dates while adjusting considerably between when the date match is crucial and when it may be ignored because working with the date is too hard.

Claiming that some public figure is good or bad while skipping over the same process to check instead for the opposite match. Creating headline quotes:
John Q. Public Achievement!
John Q. Public Greediness!
John Q. Public Delivering!
John Q. Public Embarrassed!
John Q. Public Unifying!
John Q. Public Suffering!
The personal bias concedes John Q. Public Nonsense!

A goal for this website can be to answer gematria heard or seen which is theater masquerading as wisdom. When you do recognize the long continuous chain of authentic matching you are now skimming, the alternatives look somewhat infuriating.

No one should insist that they receive actual compensation for doing gematria mathematics at all. Those who do are clearly taking advantage of anyone who doesn’t realize the simplicity of mixing and matching when they decide what to assert next. That’s low in both who and what gematria can reflect.

On the other hand, in advanced gematria we could see even higher levels improved. Speaking in gematria aloud would sound strange if it must be narrative while forcing each phrase and sentence to match a single gematria total exactly. Is that notion achievable? It is certainly achievable. It’s here in your hands. Not one deviation when you double-check any math. Not a single word is read while the gematria total breaks apart the base word. Not one sentence passed without a number behind all ending punctuation.

So what is the bottom line for this story?

This is likely the dream level of incredible gematria at no cost for anybody. This single sequence of repeating numbers say more in one page than some “experts” have convinced others to pay cash for and leave their fine families.

If you have never argued that your salary is well spent on wrong predictions or phrase manipulators common in the gematria categories, be absolutely thankful. A few are caught up, fooled, and paying for revelation. Some have been caught into webs of prediction not worthy of the wealth the spider spun into their own open pocket.

Another such concern is thinking any debate topic is better with gematria. Pick a side, create a gematria, read the result, and find what? Has this series expanded your reading of gematria enough to recognize all possible answers come out of talented gematria? Is there any doubt how I can contradict anything, demonstrate anything, or exploit anything using expert gematria? Is that not a wake up call?

Anyone can maximize any gematria result meaning if they have verbal skill. The tricks are harmless unless the answer is a  “divine” gematria result. I can assure you, I am done being impressed by word combinations somebody said “proves” any test. Give me a few minutes to think, and I’ll effectively destroy the improbable with human intelligence, caffeine, chocolate, and a keyboard.

That’s not a cheeky boast. It’s a plea for anyone eager to put faith or meaning into gematria analysis. Please identify the danger that trusting biases proclaimed to be math from secret sources is dated. Historical claims of any gematria power are labored. Computers make data even more powerful today. You are reading complete sentences in old gematria. Why is there no limit? I’ll certainly ask it again, is that not a wake up call?

Since you have identified the problem with feeling impressed by theatrical misdirection instead of a skilled gematria display, it’s forgivable whether you lost money or just time on fantasy salesmen and mystery. But once you’ve built up your confidence, change your expectation of what it takes to believe you are seeing expert gematria, instead of broken methods and maneuvering.

But most of all realize that yesterday you thought the analysis you had seen was accurate. Today you can exercise your option to see a type of gematria proof best described as purely another level of gematria.

[Evaluation also available] >>> Current coded version